Sunday, November 16, 2008

Foxes Book of Emergents With Hurt Feelings - Rob Bell (Part 7)

THE BOTTOM LINE IRONY AWARD - ROB BELL'S ATTEMPT TO EXPOSE FALSE TEACHERS
This would be laughable if it wasn't true. Rob Bell recently preached a self serving message to his congregation called "Beware of Dogs" in which he slams biblically sound discernment ministries for questioning his heretical teachings. Well, the gloves are now off and it's time to call a spade a shovel.

Maybe the net is closing in Rob but why are you so surprised when sincere Christians call you to task for your hermeneutical hack jobs and disgraceful manipulation of Scripture. There are people out there who love God's Word and love the purity of the blood bought once for all delivered Gospel and won't sit by and let you continually preach humanism and try and disguise it as Christianity. By all means sell your wares in a New Age bookstore or on Oprah but stop calling it Christianity. Sure you use the Bible and that is the problem. You USE the Bible to redefine its plain meaning into a postmodern haze.

The following youtube video/audio is a critique of the "Beware of Dogs" message. Warning - it is three hours long so bunker down with a Red Bull if you want to hear it through. Normally I wouldn't post something so lengthy but I beleive this is actually a very helpful experience for many of us who try to practice biblical discernment in a marketplace full of ideas. Chris Rosebrough, who hosts the podcast, is not everyone's cup of tea but he does an excellent job of cutting through the emergent smokescreens. Rosebrough deciphers what Rob Bell is actually teaching and how he cleverly twists biblical texts to say something other than their plain meaning.

Some of the staggering things to "emerge" from this critique include:
1.Rob Bell likes to try and lend credibility to himself by quoting Greek and Hebrew words much in the same way as the certificate of authenticity on my five dollar Rolex.
2.Rob Bell marvels as to why any Christian would be critical of a conference that tries to unite Christianity with different religions.
3.Rob Bell thinks that when people from other religions love him it is an endorsement of his message.
4.Rob Bell seems to approach Scripture willing to explore all interpretive options except for the one that leaps off the page and slaps you in the face.
5.The whole premise for the "Beware of Dogs" message, taken from Philippians 3, has absolutely nothing to do with what Philippians 3 is all about.
6.When Rob Bell talks about no place on earth he'd rather be he is not talking about the true fellowship of believers. He is talking about hanging out with buddhist monks, muslim nuns, universalists, hindus and the regular assortment of other false religions.



A Note for Erica - Rob Bell's Cyber Bodyguard
There is a woman out there called Erica who seems to think her calling in life is to defend Rob Bell from all the people out there who practice biblical discenment. I like to think of her as Rob Bell's cyber bodyguard. I don't know what she looks like but I imagine she gets around in a dark suit with dark glasses, has an earpiece with a wire running under her collar, and talks into her watch.

Erica has posted a lot of times on this blog. Initially, I appreciated Erica's warm tone and engaged in friendly dialogue. But in time some themes "emerged" that shortened my patience. I noticed her name appearing and defending Rob Bell on other places where he was criticised. I noticed that her interest seemed to be confined to Rob Bell and that she seemed to have little interest in discussing the purity of the Gospel or reasoning from Scripture (no Erica, quoting bible verses out of context does not qualify as reasoning from Scripture). She started to sound like a scratched record and would not even consider the many biblical objections brought forward by people who questioned her. When I started to cut to the chase Erica's husband wrote in calling me a jerk. Read earlier posts concerning Rob Bell and you'll see our "conversation".

So Erica, if you're out there and want to post. Say things that are biblically supportable and in context. Also show a willingness to reason from Scripture rather than just defending Rob Bell for the sake of defending him.

Go On To Part 8
Go Back To Part 6
Go Back To Part 1

10 comments:

Scott said...

I cannot stand Rob Bell. I watched and listened to his message where he comments on Peter walking on the water and then sank because Peter lost faith in himself...that was heresy immediately. He could not walk on the water because he lost faith in Christ...he was looking at Jesus and then took his eyes off of Jesus and sank. I cannot believe people actually go to hear him teach this humanistic mess each week...oh, yes I can believe it too...people that do not know God's Word will enjoy having their ears tickled.

The Bottom Line with Cameron Buettel said...

Have you seen my critique of the Dust Video on youtube? Just type "Rob Bell expose" in the search engine. It has inspired and aggravated a lot of people.

Kyle said...

Is your collar tight, Cam?

Erica said...

Grace and Peace to you Cameron. You can check out my blog if you would like I responded to you
joemartino.name/erica

The Bottom Line with Cameron Buettel said...

A word of warning about Erica's blog - it does contain expletives!

erica said...

It does?

Joe said...

Hey Cameron,
I'm trying really hard to see your perspective here. Would you mind emailing me and/or posting the expletives that you accuse my wife of using?
I am sure you are extremely busy contending for the faith and all and I am also sure that this is an integrity issue for you so you will not mind backing up what you say.
Thanks.
May God clearly shine his light upon what you do in His name.

The Bottom Line with Cameron Buettel said...

Hey Joe, since I never allow certain language on my blog as a matter of conscience I have laid this disclaimer concerning Erica's blog. I never said that Erica posted these expletives because there are other people posting on there as well and I cannot remember who it was but I recall 2 instances.

Sylvia said...

When you began describing Erica as a "bodyguard" and speaking of how you imagine she must look, I got a little nervous.
I really appreciate that you limited your description to clothing and spy gadgets. It was tasteful and funny. Perhaps you wouldn't think to do otherwise, but I know some blogger who have been very crude and personal in attacking about females with whom they disagree. I am grateful that you didn't go anywhere near that.

Matt Nash said...

Do you want to know what the Greek word for blogger is...

Jackass